Skip to main content
This walkthrough shows how to manually determine grade-level appropriateness without using Evaluators. It mirrors the Evaluating grade level appropriateness tutorial for comparison.

What you’ll need

  • A text passage to analyze
  • Access to a Flesch–Kincaid grade level calculator or spreadsheet formula
  • A qualitative rubric for evaluating complexity

Steps

STEP 1: Start with the numbers (quantitative analysis)

Begin by getting an objective baseline for the text’s difficulty. Quantitative measures analyze word length, sentence length, and syllable count.

Calculate word count

  1. Count the total number of words in the passage to estimate its density and length.
Use this general range for guidance:
  • Grades 2–3: 200–800 words
  • Grades 4–5: 200–800 words
  • Grades 6–8: 400–1000 words
  • Grades 9–10: 500–1500 words
  • Grades 11–CCR: 1500+ words

Calculate the Flesch–Kincaid grade level

Use this formula to determine the U.S. grade level. 0.39 * (TOTAL_WORDS / TOTAL_SENTENCES) + 11.8 * (TOTAL_SYLLABLES / TOTAL_WORDS) - 15.59. The result is grade.month. For example, a result of 8.2 means the text is likely suitable for a student in the second month of Grade 8. Use this as your starting estimate.

STEP 2: Evaluate text qualitatively

Numbers don’t tell the whole story. A passage with simple words might still express complex ideas. Read the text carefully and use this rubric to evaluate key features, including structure, language, and purpose.

Text structure

  • Exceedingly complex: Deep or ambiguous connections between ideas; discipline-specific organization.
  • Very complex: Expanded ideas with multiple or subtle connections.
  • Moderately complex: Some implicit links; generally sequential or chronological.
  • Slightly comple:x Clear, explicit, and predictable organization.

Language features

  • Exceedingly complex: Dense, abstract, or figurative language; complex sentences.
  • Very complex: Abstract or academic vocabulary; many complex sentences.
  • Moderately complex: Mostly explicit language and familiar vocabulary.
  • Slightly complex: Straightforward language and simple sentences.

Purpose

  • Exceedingly complex: Subtle or intricate author purpose.
  • Very complex: Implicit but inferable purpose.
  • Moderately complex: Implied but easy to identify purpose.
  • Slightly complex: Clear, concrete purpose stated directly.

Knowledge demands

  • Exceedingly complex: Requires extensive, discipline-specific knowledge.
  • Very complex: Requires moderate subject knowledge and some allusions.
  • Moderately complex: Relies on common knowledge with limited references.
  • Slightly complex:** Requires only everyday knowledge and no references.

STEP 3: Consider the student (background knowledge)

Think about the learner’s experience and readiness. A text is accessible only if the student’s background knowledge aligns with its content. Curriculum: What have students at your target grade studied? For example, would they understand a text about the Civil War, cell division, or ancient Rome? Life experience: Does the text assume life or cultural experiences your students might lack? Interest: Will the topic likely engage, bore, or confuse students at that age?

STEP 4: Synthesize your findings

Combine your quantitative and qualitative results to reach a conclusion.
  1. Weigh the evidence.
    If the Flesch–Kincaid score is high but the qualitative features are simple, the text may be suitable for a lower grade level. Conversely, a low score with abstract ideas may warrant placement in a higher grade.
  2. Determine the target grade.
    Decide the best level for independent reading—where most students can comprehend the text with minimal support.
  3. Identify an alternative grade with scaffolding.
    If younger students could access the text with help, identify the scaffolding needed, such as:
    • Pre-teaching key vocabulary
    • Providing historical or cultural context
    • Reading aloud in class
    • Breaking the text into smaller sections
    • Using graphic organizers or visual aids

Recap

This process showed you how to manually make a holistic, student-centered judgment about a text’s grade-level appropriateness, and how much of this is a subjective judgment.