Overview
The Graphics Accuracy evaluator checks whether a math graphic, such as a plot, chart, diagram, equation, or worked solution, correctly shows what its accompanying text states. It also checks whether the image is sound on its own: complete, legible, and internally consistent. The evaluator treats the text as correct and the image as the thing under review. It works in 3 steps:- Describe the image: Records what’s literally in the image, counts each feature the claim depends on (such as dots, bars, or sides) as an exact number rather than an estimate, and lists any defects, like a missing or illegible label, tick marks that don’t match their values, or parts that don’t add up to their stated total.
- Work out an answer: Finds the value or result the image yields, using only the image and any facts the question states in words, independent of what the claim says.
- Compare and decide: Checks its answer against the claim, then gives its verdict and the basis for it.
At a glance
Getting started
Follow the Quickstart to start using this evaluator:Inputs
The evaluator checks only whether a graphic is mathematically correct. It doesn’t judge grade-level fit, standards alignment, or teaching quality. The evaluator isn’t designed for grading student work, or for graphics that are wrong on purpose (like a “find the mistake” problem) unless the claim says so.
Output
Interpreting results
Evaluator release history
Related topics
Graphics evaluators
Explore other evaluators that assess the graphics in a text.
Math Standards Alignment
Check math questions against a standard’s learning components to see
which math skills they measure.
Quickstart
Run an evaluator in the Evaluators playground, a Python notebook, or with
the SDK.