Overview
Standards entities and relationships are
referenced in the U.S. academic
standards, Standards
crosswalks, English Language
Development Standards
Framework,
XQ Competencies, and Carnegie
Skills Progressions
datasets.
Entities
StandardsFramework
Complete academic standards document published by an official body like a state department of education
StandardsFrameworks serve as the root entity that organizes and contextualizes all standards within a given framework.
example.json
StandardsFrameworkItem
Individual statement or structural element within a standards framework
StandardsFrameworkItems may be normative statements (e.g., a standard that specifies what students should know or be able to do) or organizational groupings (e.g., strands, clusters).
example.json
Relationships
hasChild
Indicates that one entity serves as the parent of another
example.json
example.json
supports
Links a LearningComponent to the StandardsFrameworkItem that it supports the understanding, mastery, or achievement of
example.json
hasEducationalAlignment
Connects a curriculum entity to one or more StandardsFrameworkItem entities that it intends to teach, assess, or support
example.json
hasStandardAlignment
Connects a state standard to a standard when the 2 are supported by overlapping sets of LearningComponents
This relationship does not imply sequence, dependency, or pedagogical progression – only the degree of shared content between the 2 standards. Direction is always state → (not state → state).
example.json
Understanding the Jaccard score
A Jaccard score measures the level of similarity between 2 sets. It is scored on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0 – 0.0 represents zero overlap and 1.0 represents complete overlap. In the context of the Knowledge Graph, we use the Jaccard score to measure how similar a state standard’s Learning Components are to a standard’s Learning Components: Jaccard score = Shared Learning Components / Total unique Learning ComponentsExample: If a state standard has 5 Learning Components, a CCSSM
standard has 6, and they share 4 of them, their Jaccard score would be
4 / (5 + 6 − 4) = 0.57i.e., about 57% of these standards’ underlying skills overlapSchema release history
Related topics
U.S. academic standards dataset
Explore coverage, use cases, and download details for the U.S. academic
standards dataset.
U.S. academic standards crosswalks dataset
Explore coverage, use cases, and download details for the Standards
Crosswalks dataset.
English Language Development Standards Framework dataset
Explore coverage, use cases, and download details for the WIDA English
Language Development Standards Framework dataset.
Tutorial: Tag content to state standards
Query frameworks and standards in a step-by-step tutorial.
Tutorial: Compare Common Core and state frameworks
Walk through a crosswalk comparison tutorial with Jaccard analysis.
Standards API endpoints
Query standards by ID, search by statement code, and retrieve related
content via the REST API.
Standards crosswalks API endpoints
Find aligned standards across frameworks with similarity metrics via the
REST API.