Diagram description
Diagram description
The diagram shows the U.S. academic standards crosswalks dataset only: state mathematics standards mapped to Common Core State Standards. Both endpoints are
StandardsFrameworkItem (defined in Standards). Direction is always state → CCSS, not between states. Edge properties include jaccard and LC counts; see hasStandardAlignment.Example (New York → CCSS): A state standard is a StandardsFrameworkItem from a state framework—e.g. NY 3.NF.1 (Understand a fraction 1/b as the quantity formed by 1 part when a whole is partitioned into b equal parts). A CCSS standard is a StandardsFrameworkItem from Common Core Math—e.g. 3.NF.A.1. A hasStandardAlignment edge connects them when they share at least one Learning Component; the edge has properties such as jaccard (e.g. 0.85), stateLCCount, ccssLCCount, sharedLCCount. So: NY 3.NF.1 -[:hasStandardAlignment]-> 3.NF.A.1. Crosswalks are only state → CCSS (never state → state).Edge list (source → relationship → target):StandardsFrameworkItem(state) →hasStandardAlignment→StandardsFrameworkItem(CCSS) (e.g. NY 3.NF.1 → 3.NF.A.1)
What you’ll do
- Identify the closest Texas standards for a given CCSSM standard
- Interpret alignment strength using Jaccard scores and LC counts
- Inspect the shared Learning Components that support each alignment
What you’ll need
- API key and base URL in the Learning Commons Platform ↗
- Familiarity with the
GET /academic-standards/search,GET /academic-standards/{uuid}/crosswalks, andGET /academic-standards/{uuid}/learning-componentsAPI endpoints curl↗, Python, or Node
Steps
1
Set up environment variables
.env
2
Find the Texas standards that best match the 6.EE.B.5 CCSSM standard
First, use Use the The response contains the Texas standards that share Learning Components with your target 6.EE.B.5 CCSSM standard, with overlap metrics:
GET /academic-standards/search to find the 6.EE.B.5 CCSSM standard.Then, use GET /academic-standards/{uuid}/crosswalks to get Texas standards that share Learning Components with that CCSSM standard.Response
GET /academic-standards/{caseIdentifierUUID}/crosswalks API endpoint with the caseIdentifierUUID from your response:Response
3
Interpret the relationship metrics
Each crosswalk relationship carries additional context about the degree of overlap:
sharedLCCount– Number of shared deconstructed skillsstateLCCount– Number of skills that support the state standardccssLCCount– Number of skills that support the CCSSM standard
4
Inspect shared Learning Components
Now that you have crosswalk pairs (CCSSM → Texas), retrieve the actual skills (i.e. Learning Components) that support each standard.This analysis reveals the Learning Components that are present in both standards, and the Learning Components that are unique to either the CCSS or state standard.
5
Keep exploring
Now that you understand which Learning Components are shared vs. unique, you can make informed decisions about how to adapt your content to align to curriculum standards.Explore other Standards crosswalks to compare other states’ standards to Common Core and to guide alignment work across frameworks in your own edtech product.
Related topics
Use cases
Explore standards alignment, planning, crosswalks, curriculum, and
assessment workflows.
Tutorial: Tag content to state standards
Query frameworks and standards in a step-by-step tutorial.
Tutorial: Generate practice questions
Use progressions to find prerequisites and generate practice content.